Barack Obama's political campaign displays the logical fallacy of red herring in an advertisement commercial about his opponent John McCain. In this advertisement, Obama makes the effort to merely "win" the argument and ultimately the political race rather than emphasizing a critical issue about the nation's economy. The commercial starts with the claim that John McCain does not "understand the fundamentals of the economy." However, it ends with the assertion that McCain owns seven houses, essentially diverting the attention from the issue of the economy to how much McCain's houses cost. This represents red herring fallacy in that the first topic about McCain being ignorant about the fundamentals of the economy, then a new topic is introduced that is partially relevant but does not fully support the issue presented in the beginning of the argument. Therefore, the original topic is "abandoned" (The Nizkor Project 2011), and a new topic about McCain's houses is introduced. In essence, the argument is "supported" or reasoned by a distracting subject change rather than efficient arguments that strongly relate to the purpose of the claim. The fallacy presented in Obama's campaign advertisement depicts that simply drawing the attention away from the issues presented does not prove an argument reasonable.
Obama's advertisement can be found here!